In RF-/STEEL EC3, sets of members are calculated according to the General Method (EN 1993-1-1, Cl. 6.3.4) together with the stability analysis. To do this, it is necessary to determine the correct support conditions for the equivalent structure with four degrees of freedom. In most 3D models today, you can quickly lose track of the location of a set of members in the system.
The "Result Beam" member type has been available since the release of RFEM 5. The result beam is a virtual member that does not have any stiffness nor require any support. It can be used in various situations in order to integrate the results from members, surfaces, and solids, and to display them as member internal forces.
Both the determination of natural vibrations and the response spectrum analysis are always performed on a linear system. If nonlinearities exist in the system, they are linearized and thus not taken into account. They are caused by, for example, tension members, nonlinear supports, or nonlinear hinges. This article shows how you can handle them in a dynamic analysis.
To simulate a support clearance in a connection between members, you can use the "Diagram" function for member hinges. To use this function, first define the relevant degree of freedom as release. Then, you can select the "Diagram" function from the drop‑down list.
The most common causes of unstable models are failing member nonlinearities such as tension members. As the simplest example, there is a frame with supports on the column footing and moment hinges on the column head. This unstable system is stabilized by a cross bracing of tension members. In the case of load combinations with horizontal loads, the system remains stable. However, if it is loaded vertically, both tension members fail and the system becomes unstable, which causes a calculation error. You can avoid such an error by selecting the exceptional handling of failing members under "Calculate" → "Calculation Parameters" → "Global Calculation Parameters".
A standard scenario in timber member construction is the ability to connect smaller members by means of bearing on a larger girder member. Additionally, member end conditions may include a similar situation where the beam is bearing on a support type. In either scenario, the beam must be designed to consider the bearing capacity perpendicular to the grain according to NDS 2018 Sec. 3.10.2 and CSA O86:19 Clauses 6.5.6 and 7.5.9. In general structural design software, it is typically not possible to carry out this full design check, as the bearing area is unknown. However, in the new generation RFEM 6 and Timber Design add-on, the added 'design supports' feature now allows users to comply with the NDS and CSA bearing perpendicular to the grain design checks.
Buckling analysis according to the effective width method or the reduced stress method is based on the determination of the system critical load, hereinafter called LBA (linear buckling analysis). This article explains the analytical calculation of the critical load factor as well as utilization of the finite element method (FEM).
RF-PUNCH Pro performs punching shear design on concentrated load application locations (column connection, nodal support, and nodal load) as well as on wall ends and wall corners.
A member's boundary conditions decisively influence the elastic critical moment for lateral-torsional buckling Mcr. The program uses a planar model with four degrees of freedom for its determination. The corresponding coefficients kz and kw can be defined individually for standard-compliant cross-sections. This allows you to describe the degrees of freedom available at both member ends due to the support conditions.
The following article describes a design using the equivalent member method according to [1] Section 6.3.2, performed on an example of a cross-laminated timber wall susceptible to buckling described in Part 1 of this article series. The buckling analysis will be performed as a compressive stress analysis with reduced compressive strength. For this, the instability factor kc is determined, which depends primarily on the component slenderness and the support type.
The previous post on this topic describes instabilities that may occur when using tension members. The example shown refers primarily to wall stiffening. Now, instability error messages can also refer to nodes within the range of supports. Truss girders and support trusses are especially susceptible to this. What causes the instability here?
When performing shear force design in RF-CONCRETE Members and CONCRETE, you can reduce the acting shear force Vz according to EN 1992-1-1. The following article describes the reduction of the concentrated loads close to the support and the shear force design at the distance d from the support face for a uniform load.
For the serviceability limit state design according to Section 6.6 of Eurocode EN 1997‑1, settlement has to be calculated for spread foundations. RF-/FOUNDATION Pro allows you to perform the settlement calculation for a single foundation. For this, you can chose between an elastic and a solid foundation. By defining a soil profile, it is possible to consider several soil layers under the foundation base. The results of the settlement, foundation tilting, and vertical soil contact stress distribution are displayed graphically and in tables to provide a quick and clear overview of the calculation performed. In addition to the design of the foundation settlement in RF-/FOUNDATION Pro, the structural analysis determines the representative spring constants for the support and can be exported to the structural model of RFEM or RSTAB.
Starting with program version X.06, you can set in RF‑CONCRETE Members or CONCRETE whether the crack width analysis should be performed in any case, or only when exceeding the effective tensile strength of concrete.
Parameterized entries provide the engineer with an efficiency-increasing tool. This allows entering structural and loading data so that they depend on certain variables. These variables (for example, length, width, live load, and so on) are called parameters.
Nodal supports are usually defined with regard to the global axis system. However, it is sometimes necessary to rotate the nodal support. For example, for a floor slab with a pile foundation. For geological reasons, the piles do not rest in the ground vertically, but in an inclined position. Each end point of the piles has a nodal support that can only absorb forces along the pile foundation direction. Therefore, rotating the nodal support is required. Various options for this are described in previous posts.
In the display properties, you can select Results → Support Reactions → Nodal Moments to specify whether a support moment should be displayed as an arc or a vector.
NCI to DIN EN 1993‑6, Part 2.3.1 allows reductions of dynamic coefficients for values ≧ 1.1. Therefore, you can use these reduced support loads for designing support and hanger structures. In CRANEWAY, if you select National Annex "DIN" and dynamic coefficients ≧ 1.1, the reduction is considered automatically.
In RF-PUNCH Pro, enlarged column heads can be arranged at point-supported punching shear points, thus increasing the shear force resistance of a reinforced concrete floor. In the following article, we will show the punching shear design with the optional application of an enlarged column head.
The optimal scenario in which punching shear design according to ACI 318-19 [1] or CSA A23.3:19 [2] should be utilized is when a slab is experiencing a high concentration of loading or reaction forces occurring at one single node. In RFEM 6, the node in which punching shear is an issue is referred to as a punching shear node. The causes of these high concentration of forces can be introduced by a column, concentrated force, or nodal support. Connecting walls can also cause these concentrated loads at wall ends, corners, and ends of line loads and supports.
The punching shear design, in line with EN 1992-1-1, should be performed for slabs with a concentrated load or reaction. The node where the design of punching shear resistance is performed (that is, where there is a punching problem) is called a node of punching shear. The concentrated load at these nodes can be introduced by columns, concentrated force, or nodal supports. The end of the linear load introduction on slabs is also regarded as a concentrated load and therefore, the shear resistance at wall ends, wall corners, and ends or corners of line loads and line supports should be controlled as well.
For structural components consisting of slabs, it is necessary to perform shear design on the locations with concentrated load introduction, applying the punching shear design rules according to Sect. 6.4 of EN 1992‑1‑1 [1]. The concentrated load introduction is present on the individual locations, for example by columns, concentrated load, or nodal supports. In addition, the end of linear load introduction on slabs is also regarded as concentrated load introduction. For example, this includes wall ends, wall corners, and ends or corners of line loads and line supports. You can perform the punching shear design for floor slabs or foundations, considering the existing available plate topology about the designed node of punching shear. The punching shear design according to EN 1992‑1‑1 checks that the acting shear force vEd does not exceed the resistance vRd.
When evaluating line support forces, implausible diagrams sometimes arise at first glance. In particular, for variable loads at locations that also have a nodal support, at division points and edge locations of supported lines, the results sometimes show unexpected support reactions. Using the function of the linear smooth distribution in Project Navigator – Display does not always lead to the expected result diagram.
The boundary conditions of a plate support can be entered quickly as singular and line supports in the FEA software. However, if the flexibility of the supports is not considered when modeling the structure, it is often necessary to take a closer look at the support definitions during the design using stresses or the determination of the required reinforcement, at the latest.
RFEM and RSTAB offer different options to model bored piles. One option is to display bored piles as single-valued supports or hinged columns. Another option is realistic modeling while taking the soil into account by means of applying a member elastic foundation. The two following examples will describe it in detail. However, pile base resistance, skin friction, and soil layers are not considered in this technical article.
When modeling structural bearing systems, especially hall structures, some substructures of a foundation with no influence on the rising structure are not modeled in RFEM/RSTAB. In the case of hall structures, these are, for example, reinforced concrete floor slabs, strip foundations, and the ties between column foundations.
According to Book 631 of the DAfStb (German Committee for Structural Concrete), Chapter 2.4, the structural behavior of ceilings changes if their continuous support by walls is interrupted in areas of openings. Depending on the length of the opening area and the plate thickness, measures are necessary regarding the analysis of the ceiling in the area of the opening.
If nodal supports should have an effect in certain directions only, you can define failure. Here is an example of a single‑span beam, of which the right support can only absorb positive vertical loads. The load comprise vertical suction load and horizontal load. However, there are 2 failure options: 1) Failure if negative PZ' 2) Failure all if negative PZ' The difference is illustrated in the graphic.